Educating Essex Essay

Dear editor, I am writing to you be grow I find it unrealistic to understand why Educating Essex represents teenagers in this much(prenominal) way to society today, it only makes an impression of them, that all Britains teenagers are goby, impolite, spoilt and lacking enough self-discipline to interact with anyone. This supports stereotypes of modern reckless teens, when in reality the bulk of Britains teenagers are interesting, polite and simply brilliant young people quietly exit about the business of creating a bright future for themselves.On Educating Essex I excite witnessed many negative things that show teenagers in a bad way, such as students walking across a table, pupils on mobile phones, swearing at each early(a) and teachers, cyber-bullying, teenage pregnancy and young girls caked with make-up, even the accession is very negative towards teenagers. This shows that all teenagers dont behave in school and do not care about their education and future, only when majo rity of students are not like that, most of them are fun-loving, active and mature for their age.I think the reason for their behaviour are the cameras, as most of them deprivation to show mangle and think its a good idea to play up to them. Educating Essex has only focused on the students that badly behave and cause the trouble all the time, still they havent showed the good side of teenagers, where they work hard in class, and behave because they are working to achieve the same of five or to a greater extent GCSEs at grade A* to C.The programme only creates a fake image of a typical teenager, but certainly they do not act like that, and I know that because I am a student myself, and Ive never attainn this kind of behaviour in my school. I think that the Daily Mail article only focuses on the teachers in Educating Essex and mostly points out the bad things teachers say and do. Also how they swing out the lesson, it shows how immature they are when they burst into a class and disturb the lesson just to sing happy birthday.Another teacher is shown as the students are deviation his class he tells them Clear off, scumbags. In a different scene it shows when Mr Goddard hides behind his door as Mr Drew enters the room, he reaches out his arm rough the door to welcome his deputy with a two-fingered gesture, and Mr Drews respond is You are such a ****er. In episode two, there is a scene shown of a girl called Carmelita, who accuses the deputy of assaulting her.At first she tells him to get lost and shut up, but in the end she gets excluded when he tells him to **** off. The deputy is cleared after the headtecher watches the CCTVcameras footage. Also the article mentions that this sort of behaviour by pupils shouldnt be allowed and there is extremely childish behaviour by the teachers, who are setting a very bad example for the pupils as they are likely to see the programme in results of this the teenagers are influenced by what they see on the TV, and think its right to behave in this practical way, another influence are the teachers, as they set an example for the students.One more significant reason for childs behaviour are the parents, because of the way they are bough up, if they have problems at home they will release their anger in school, on students and teachers. But essentially that article did not mention any positive things about teenagers. There were few positive things that Ive witnessed on Educating Essex but not many as I expected to be. I think one of them was when, they showed the students reflecting on what they have done wrong and teachers, because its great to render both sides of the story, also the relationship between the teachers and students which doesnt happen very often.Additionally how the teachers refused to give up on challenging the pupils, so they have a chance to achieve. But I think the programme shouldve showed more of the satisfactory students who are interesting, polite and clearly brilliant young people trying to achieve, to have a better future. The Observer article has also only highlighted the bad points about teenagers, much the same as the Daily Mail article. But it makes the lector hate teens, as they call them gobby, spaced- out, bizarre this only shows how selfish they are, and do not care about others.Also they point out how they dress and parent to girls as spoiled brats, and in my opinion they are allowed to do what they want, because its their own choice to look like that. I think that the programme doesnt give a real image of teenagers today because, in my opinion everyone is different, and also because it only concentrated on the bad behaved student where on the other hand there is more students that work really hard on everything, and also contribute in society.